Laura J's profileThe Talking PointPhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog


    May 29

    The Talking Point


    This blog is now defunct.
    May 26

    David Cameron pledges radical political reform

    Conservative leader David Cameron (Image © PA)

    What’s happening?

    Conservative leader David Cameron has promised a radical reform of the political system to restore public faith in British democracy in the wake of the MPs’ expenses scandal. Writing in the Guardian, he declared he would trim back the powers of the prime minister and government and give MPs more influence over legislation. Cameron’s proposals to decentralise power would prompt the biggest change in the way Britain is governed in the modern era.

    What are people saying?

    “I believe the central objective of the new politics we need should be a massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power,” Cameron wrote. “From the state to citizens; from the government to parliament; from Whitehall to communities. From the EU to Britain; from judges to the people; from bureaucracy to democracy. Through decentralisation, transparency and accountability we must take power away from the political elite and hand it to the man and woman in the street.”

    Why should we give a damn?

    Cameron said a Tory government would:

    • Limit the power of the prime minister by considering fixed-term parliaments, ending the right of Downing Street to control the timing of general elections.
    • End the “pliant” role of parliament by giving MPs free votes during the consideration of bills at committee stage. MPs would also be handed the crucial power of deciding the timetable of bills.
    • Boost the power of backbench MPs – and limit the powers of the executive – by allowing MPs to choose the chairs and members of Commons select committees.
    • Reduce the number of MPs in Westminster, initially by 10%, and ensure every vote has an equal value.
    • Open up the legislative process to outsiders by sending out text alerts on the progress of parliamentary bills and by posting proceedings on YouTube.
    • Limit the use of the royal prerogative - which allows the prime minister, in the name of the monarch, to make major decisions - so parliament is properly involved in all major national decisions.
    • End the culture of "sofa government" in Downing Street by limiting the number of spin doctors and strengthening the ministerial code. 
    • Publish the expenses claims of all public servants earning more than £150,000.
    • Strengthen local government by giving councils the power of “competence”, allowing them to do "whatever they like as long as it's legal." This would allow councils to reverse Whitehall decisions to close popular services, such as a local post office or a railway station, by giving them the power to raise money to keep them open.
    • Create a new power of "citizen's initiative", with local referendums on issues where more than 5% of the electorate have signed up.
    • End the "state monopoly" on state education, allowing any suitable organisation to set up a new school. Parents who are unhappy with their child's education will be able to send their child to a new school, backed by government funding.

    Your thoughts?

     


    Share It
    Share this post using del.icio.us del.icio.us  Share this post using Digg Digg  Share this post using Facebook Facebook  Share this post using Google Google 
    Share this post using Live Spaces Live Spaces  Share this post using MySpace MySpace  Share this post using Newsvine Newsvine  Share this post using Reddit Reddit 
    Share this post using StumbleUpon StumbleUpon  Share this post using Technorati Technorati  Share this post using Twitter Twitter  Share this post using Yahoo! My Web Yahoo! My Web 
    May 21

    Gurkhas granted right to live in Britain

     
    (Joanna Lumley with Gurkha VC veterans Lachhiman Gurong (left) and Tul Bahador Pun/Image © John Stillwell/PA) 
     
    What’s happening?
     
    Gurkhas have been granted the right to live in Britain in a dramatic u-turn by the government. About 36,000 Nepalese soldiers who left the British Army brigade before 1997 had previously been refused citizenship. Ministers were forced to rethink following the government’s humiliating defeat in the Commons last month. Veterans will now be given the same settlement rights as Commonwealth soldiers who fought on behalf of the UK.
     
    What are people saying?
     
    In a statement to the Commons at 12:15pm today, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said all Gurkhas who retired before 1997 and served more than four years would be able to bring their spouses and children with them to Britain. There will be no time limit on the policy and resources will be made available to the UK Borders Agency. "I'm delighted we have now been able to agree new settlement rights that all of those who have served us so well rightly deserve," she said. Gordon Brown previously said he had a “great deal of sympathy and support” for veterans. “I believe it is possible for us to honour our commitment to the Gurkhas and to do so in a way that protects the public finances,” he said during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday.
     
    Why should we give a damn?
     
    The original policy was “blatantly discriminatory,” said Labour MP Martin Salter, who chaired a group of MPs calling for Gurkhas’ rights. In an interview with BBC News, he said the campaign had “encapsulated the British sense of fair play.” Joanna Lumley spearheaded the campaign, famously cornering Immigration Minister Phil Woolas in a TV studio after veterans’ applications were rejected. Speaking after today's announcement, she said: "This is a day for celebration. A great injustice has been righted." The actress also paid tribute to Gordon Brown: "a brave man who has made a brave decision on the bravest of the brave."
     
    Your thoughts?
     
    Gurkha factfile:
     
    • Gurkhas have been part of the British Army since 1815, when the British East India Company signed a peace deal allowing it to recruit from the ranks of the former enemy following the invasion of Nepal
    • The name ‘Gurkha’ comes from Gorkha, a feudal hill village in what is now western Nepal
    • Four Gurkha regiments were transferred from the Indian Army to the British Army following the partition of India in 1947
    • Members of the Gurkha brigade have fought on Britain’s behalf all over the world, receiving a total of 13 Victoria Crosses
    • The major units of the Brigade today are The Royal Gurkha Rifles (two battalions), The Queen's Gurkha Engineers, Queen's Gurkha Signals and The Queen's Own Gurkha Logistic Regiment
    • The soldiers still carry their traditional weapon into battle: an 18-inch long curved knife, called the ‘kukri’
    • Gurkhas are still chosen from the hills of Nepal, with more than 28,000 young men competing for 200 places each year
    • The selection process is one of the world’s most gruelling: aspiring Gurkhas have to run uphill for 40 minutes carrying on their backs a wicker basket filled with 70lb of rocks



    Share It
    Share this post using del.icio.us del.icio.us  Share this post using Digg Digg  Share this post using Facebook Facebook  Share this post using Google Google 
    Share this post using Live Spaces Live Spaces  Share this post using MySpace MySpace  Share this post using Newsvine Newsvine  Share this post using Reddit Reddit 
    Share this post using StumbleUpon StumbleUpon  Share this post using Technorati Technorati  Share this post using Twitter Twitter  Share this post using Yahoo! My Web Yahoo! My Web 
    May 19

    Speaker Michael Martin quits "to maintain unity"

     
    (Image © PA)
     
    What’s happening?
     
    Michael Martin has resigned as Speaker of the House of Commons over the MPs’ expenses scandal – the most high-profile victim of the crisis and the first speaker to be forced from office in more than 300 years. Twenty-three MPs signed a motion calling for him to step down for his role in trying to keep parliamentary expenses secret. When campaigners first tried to uncover details under the freedom of information act, the Commons Commission – of which Martin was chair – fought the case in the high court. It eventually lost and agreed to publish details later this year. When the Daily Telegraph published leaked claims, however, Martin drew further criticism by calling for a police investigation.
     
    What are people saying?
     
    Addressing the House of Commons at 2:30pm today, Martin spoke only briefly to confirm he would stand down on June 21 “in order that unity can be maintained” in the House. After the announcement, Tory MP Douglas Carswell told BBC News: “The key is that the next speaker owes their position to the legislature as a whole. There is a duty to create a House of Commons that works. Changing the speaker is the beginning of a far-reaching process of reform.” Labour MP Sir Stuart Bell, a close ally of Martin, said: “He paid a heavy price for trying to be an establishment figure when the establishment was corrupt.” Angus Robertson, leader of the SNP in Westminster, reiterated calls for a general election. “This is a much bigger problem than one person,” he said. Harriet Harman, leader of the House, described the decision as “an act of great generosity to the House of Commons that MPs from all parties will respect.”
     
    Why should we give a damn?
     
    Some say Martin’s departure will herald the beginning of the end of the current crisis gripping Westminster; others say the issue of how to restore public faith in politics is yet to be resolved. Blogger Guido Fawkes describes Martin as “one of the most outrageous examples of personal enrichment at the public’s expense while pretending to be a public servant.” Guardian political commentator Michael White disagrees: “It is wrong to blame him for the decay of parliament; he has been a symptom, not the cause.” Either way, the move is expected to pave the way for a radical reform of parliament. Senior Labour MP Sir Stuart Bell told the Press Association: “I can tell you the Cabinet... will approve a series of reforms which will place the House of Commons in the hands of independent regulators rather than the House itself. The nature of the role of the speaker will change. There will no longer be a speaker who is in charge as chief executive. He will be procedural and ceremonial.”
     
    Will that be enough to clean up Westminster? Your thoughts...
     

    Share It
    Share this post using del.icio.us del.icio.us  Share this post using Digg Digg  Share this post using Facebook Facebook  Share this post using Google Google 
    Share this post using Live Spaces Live Spaces  Share this post using MySpace MySpace  Share this post using Newsvine Newsvine  Share this post using Reddit Reddit 
    Share this post using StumbleUpon StumbleUpon  Share this post using Technorati Technorati  Share this post using Twitter Twitter  Share this post using Yahoo! My Web Yahoo! My Web